Date: 2007-11-21 09:20 pm (UTC)
ext_189645: (lurcher)
From: [identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com
According to tonight's news, they didn't need to see the records, and after a previous occasion when they'd been sent the entire dataset on CD, NAO had asked them to only send the data that needed to be checked, not all of it.

Apparently SELECT fieldname, fieldname, fieldname was too expensive, when you could just SELECT *...

The whole thing is somehow boggling, yet utterly predictable...

Date: 2007-11-21 11:02 pm (UTC)
ext_27570: Richard in tricorn hat (Default)
From: [identity profile] sigisgrim.livejournal.com
It's just a bunch of civil servants who are a bit (lot) out of their depth, but now less dangerous for that.

If one does need to physically transfer that amount of highly sensitive data you physically walk / drive / fly it to where it needs to go. But what is wrong with remote access? Get your server / database to talk to my server / database. We know it's not that difficult, but I suspect that their IT systems are so wrapped up in protection, isolated from the rest of the world (rest of reality) that no friendly system can talk to another one.

I bet these are people who insist on 15 character passwords with lower case, UPPER CASE, 999, and $&^^%@!$ that change every 30 days which nobody can remember and everybody writes down. *shakes head*

Date: 2007-11-21 11:09 pm (UTC)
ext_189645: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com
The killer detail for me was that there was a password on it, but no encryption. That's really funny: the token effort based on tragic misconception.

It makes me think of the joke about the countryman giving directions :

"well, if I was going where you're going, I wouldn't be starting from here!"

Profile

bunn: (Default)
bunn

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 06:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios