Nuclear power stations
Nov. 30th, 2005 02:22 pmHave I missed something? Has there been some change in the technology that means that putting new nuclear power stations on a small crowded island that is a target for suicide bombers is a good idea?
Why is it better to make radioactive waste than carbon dioxide?
I thought the whole idea had been more or less written off after Chernobyl.
Why is it better to make radioactive waste than carbon dioxide?
I thought the whole idea had been more or less written off after Chernobyl.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 04:58 pm (UTC)But I haven't heard anything at all about that since I stumbled over the report on some obscure radio station. It does sound cheaper and safer than nuclear though. All you seem to hear about is wind, which isn't reliable enough.
Our old family house in Shirwell had solar panels (well, it still does). They are pretty good for heating water, even in the winter - but we don't really get enough sun in the UK to generate electricity from it, I believe. I'm thinking we might get them here one day, though being on the north side of a hill, they might not work so well.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 05:26 pm (UTC)I've not heard of the maize fuel idea, I'd be interested to read more on that. My main worry would be what if the crop failed for some reason - what would they burn instead? It reminded me of the cars that can run on vegetable oil, apparently they smell like a chippy while they're running. I'd quite like one of them, but I think it might make me want to eat chips too often.
I have read about people who do manage to produce enough electricity from their solar panels that their meter runs backwards as they feed power back into the national grid. I think they had an awful lot of panels though.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-01 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-03 10:16 pm (UTC)