Nuclear power stations

[bunn]

Have I missed something? Has there been some change in the technology that means that putting new nuclear power stations on a small crowded island that is a target for suicide bombers is a good idea?

Why is it better to make radioactive waste than carbon dioxide?

I thought the whole idea had been more or less written off after Chernobyl.

Comments

[bunn.livejournal.com]

Also, I think they should rot dog-poo and make methane. Did you know all the dog poo is wrapped in plastic, then taken away from poo bins and burnt in incinerators? What a huge waste of energy for a completely biodegradable substance!

[chainmailmaiden]

I agree bio-fuel should be exploited too and not just dog poo, cows famously produce lots of methane, I believe there is an island of monks that produce all their power needs from their cow shed. Then again I don't suppose their power needs are that great.

I've not heard of the maize fuel idea, I'd be interested to read more on that. My main worry would be what if the crop failed for some reason - what would they burn instead? It reminded me of the cars that can run on vegetable oil, apparently they smell like a chippy while they're running. I'd quite like one of them, but I think it might make me want to eat chips too often.

I have read about people who do manage to produce enough electricity from their solar panels that their meter runs backwards as they feed power back into the national grid. I think they had an awful lot of panels though.

[bunn.livejournal.com]

Wow - maybe solar panels have got more effective. will have to look into it again. The ones we had would be about 20 years old now so it wouldn't surprise me.

[jane-somebody.livejournal.com]

In Holland, apparantly, they have a system for recycling disposable nappies to create energy/fertilizer/paper; I wish they'd introduce that here, since I have reluctantly abandoned the idea of washable nappies as impractical for me at this time, and am feeling bad about the land-fill volume.