Disturbing searches 2
Dec. 12th, 2006 03:58 pmDoing keyword research for a client now in the throes of the final Christmas rush, for last minute promotions, I research the area of the remote controlled Dalek. There are many Dalek-related searches, but only one that counts as truly disturbing:
Dalek porn.
Yes, someone out there is googling for Dalek porn. I don't know if that is Daleks in revealing skimpy costumes, or porn created BY Daleks.
Frankly, I don't want to know.
Dalek porn.
Yes, someone out there is googling for Dalek porn. I don't know if that is Daleks in revealing skimpy costumes, or porn created BY Daleks.
Frankly, I don't want to know.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:28 pm (UTC)(Though possibly one of
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:39 pm (UTC)Parrot_knight has far more obscure Who literature than I do...
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-13 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-13 11:45 am (UTC)You do surprise me, I didn't think the Katy Manning shots were all that obscure. At least one of the books I own has them in...
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:40 pm (UTC)With a sick sense of watching my own finger do something I didn't want them too, I found myself googling too - and found....
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/28/dalek_film/
Good grief.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:42 pm (UTC)Arg, that's even worse!
I'm bailing out of this thread....
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:37 pm (UTC)My, what a big plunger you have...
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 05:41 pm (UTC)The one I posted to chainmailmaiden above, alas, does.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 06:24 pm (UTC)Unable to resist, a few minutes later I gingerly typed in "Lego porn." Results came up. I haven't dared click on them, though. I think I want to forget this thread rather quickly.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-15 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-12 06:34 pm (UTC)