Merseyside dog amnesty

[bunn]

I have just looked at  this PDF leaflet issued by Merseyside police about their  illegal dog amnesty.   It makes me angry.

 In particular, the description of 'how to identify an illegal dog' combined with 'who will decide a dog is illegal' and the advice to report dogs belonging to one's friends family and neighbours makes me want to march up and down ranting loudly.   I would like some non-dog-owner people to tell me if they think I am overreacting.

Comments

[bunn.livejournal.com]

The thing is though, they are not being asked to shop people with *dangerous* dogs. They are being asked to shop people with dogs that are a (very vaguely specified) shape and size. Not at all the same thing, but I'm very interested that you fell for the idea that shape=aggression.

The Kennel club disagree with that: http://tinyurl.com/3bvbnp
So does the Association of Pet Dog trainers: http://tinyurl.com/2o7y6x

In fact, the leaflet says people cannot hand in a dog that isn't that shape and size, even if it *is* dangerous. So someone with a very badly socialised, aggressive, illtrained GSD or akita or wolfhound is fine because those are hairy dogs - but a staffy that happens to have unusually long legs is a menace to children? Staffys are often described as 'nanny dogs' because they are so good with kids!

Yes, a collie is more likely to herd than a terrier, but a collie (even a working collie) is a breed, not a 'type'. If you had a crossbreed that looked like a collie but happened to be mostly made up of, say, saluki, GSD and staffy, to name a bizarre mix that would likely have roughly the right size and coat type - it would be most unlikely to be good at herding.

I don't want to see more pit bulls being bred: pit bulls do have an inbred problem with dog aggression (though that is not at all the same thing as aggression to humans) and there are plenty more suitable breeds available as family pets, so why import a problem?

But encouraging people to report their neighbours for having (say) a lab x boxer, or a staffy lurcher? Those would fit, and can look quite 'pit-like', but unless the poor animal had been very badly raised and trained (any dog *can* be dangerous), the major risk would that it would drool on your jacket.

I *hope* that nobody would report a pure greyhound or a whippetx as a dangerous dog, and that the police would laugh at them if they did. However, whether my own dogs are directly affected or not, I think this is an appalling initiative.

One effect of this, I am told by people who are local, has been that there are people in the Merseyside area who have vaguely squarish looking dogs that are no longer being walked publicly, because they are afraid of being reported. That means that in people's houses there are very likely now a bunch of bored, frustrated dogs that are missing out on vital socialisation and exercise. Most of the dog attacks I can think of have been by poorly socialised dogs on children in their own homes.

[bunn.livejournal.com]

nobody would report a pure greyhound or a whippetx as a dangerous dog

Arg, I'm doing it now! I mean, as an 'illegal' dog. Greyhounds and whippets can be dangerous, as all dogs can, and I hope that if a sighthound was being kept in a way that made it a risk to the public it would be reported and dealt with appropriately.

[smirnoffmule.livejournal.com]

The semantics of this debate are so loaded, aren't they? If you don't support the amnesty, you must support people owning dangerous dogs. I can see exactly why you're angry, and I'm angry too (though as a staffie cross owner, I'm not exactly an objective party). The part about being invited to shop your neighbours is particularly worrying, because most members of the public are not in the least bit qualified to identify a dog's breed by sight, and they've been told to look out for a dog which simply happens to look a certain way, never mind how it behaves. That link describes my dog, it describes all manner of crosses and other dogs that aren't Pit Bulls at all, and even if your neighbour's dog doesn't resemble that description, don't worry, because Pit Bulls can vary in size, weight and characteristics, so it still might be one anyway!

I could just rant about the idiocy all day, and the really sad thing is that nobody who knowingly illegally owns a pit bull, or who is involved in dog fighting, or other criminal activities is going to hand their dog over - the dogs that are going to be handed over will be the pets of frightened families.